|

This article, written by Tina M. Barber, is reprinted from the Winter 2001 SSDCA Newsletter
Part I
T his has been a
very productive year for all of us. The SSDCA joined us to sponsor the
Health Survey 2000, and we have all been working very hard to compile
enough data so that Dr. Padgett can help us to focus on
eliminating/reducing the incidence of many of the diseases we are seeing
in our breed. We diligently mailed out a survey package that
consisted of 17 full (small print) pages to every person that has
registered their dog, since our data base started! Over 800 of these
packets were mailed. Unfortunately, about 10% of those surveys were
returned because many forwarding orders had expired. In each case where we
received a new address, or were able to otherwise locate a more recent
one, the packets were re-mailed. Yet so far fewer than 100 replies have
been received out of all these Shiloh owners. The rest of the data that
has been collected came from breeders that supplied information on the
dogs they have owned over the past 9 years. We are aware of the fact that
hundreds of puppies were also born into the counterfeit registry
over the past 2 years, and that documentation of the health problems that
this group has been experiencing is important to the overall welfare of
the entire breed! Yet, we have been unable to locate most of these Shiloh
owners although we have provided a special section just for them.
If you know any of these people, or have a current address for them,
please contact the Genetic Task Force (GTF) with this information, or just
ask your friends to complete the survey that is available on our web site,
with full instructions, and send it in! We have extended our deadline
for data collection until 5/31/2001. Each month, as new data is
collected, we will be updating our Internet charts.
Our GTF leaders have been very busy contacting breeders
and owners in order to meet our quota of 700 reports. Hundreds of hours
have already been spent on making phone calls across the country, in an
effort to collect more data! AWSA (American White Shepherd Association)
members were also told that they would need a minimum of 665 completed
surveys, but were actually able to collect over 1,000!! I know that if we
all team up to help our GTF we can accomplish (and possibly even exceed)
our goals too!!!!
As a reminder, here are the names and phone numbers of the Genetic Task
Force:
-
Pat Urso (CDT) (715 ) 362-4134
-
Pam DymondWeed (PDT) (206) 542-3555
-
Mynde Bunker (PDT) (209) 586-3518
-
Karen Ursel (EDT) (716) 346-6741 (between
7 9 PM EDT only, please)
-
Lyn Segee (EDT) (716) 658-3240 (between
7-9 PM EDT)
Although we now have 2427 Shilohs in our database we
also have over 45,000 ancestors, enabling us to run the most intense
detailed Inbreeding Coefficient reports ever possible. Out of the 1562
puppies born into the ISSR as of the end of our last fiscal year (9/00) we
have registered only 1162 Shiloh Shepherds via the TCCP. This total
does not include the hundreds of puppies that were born, out of ISSR
parents but taken into the various other club/groups and have
obtained some other/fake type of computer generated certificates. The
more data we are able to collect on every dog born, the more accuracy we
can attain for this survey. Our SSDCA secretary, also a member of the
GTF, compiled some very interesting charts for my first seminar, regarding
ways to help us eliminate these diseases from our gene-pool, held last
November. We will continue to upgrade these charts as more data is
collected, but for now I wanted to share a quick preview with all of you.
|
The numbers listed above do not represent every ISSR puppy born. Pets
that were never upgraded to breeding status are not listed in the RC and GTF
databases .
Prior to 1990, 321 specially selected breeding quality Shiloh Shepherds were
incorporated as foundation stock. These were entered into the TCCP database. Each of these dogs had 5-9 generations of LMX
(litter-mate x-ray) data on their ancestors, since most were born at Konigin/Shiloh
kennels or through Tina Barber's co-ownerships. These old stud
books/breeders records dating back to 1962 were carefully screened for
important genetic data that was needed to set a solid foundation for the
future welfare of this breed, while under development.
Please note: This also does not include all puppies born after the
failure of the FIC, which registered some litters in the fall of 1990.
During the reorganizing between 1990-93 many litters were also born into the AKC and later received individual ISSR papers as per the
applicable
transitional qualifications and prior to the TCCP taking over all data
processing for the ISSR in 1993.
TCCP reports are based on
dogs that they have physically added into our ISSR Shiloh Shepherd database.
Dogs born during the transition with AKC or ISSR papers are documented
in the merged ISSR database used for RC calculations and GTF documentation.
For more information, please visit
Games People Play. |
To begin with, as most of you know, our survey listed
the same diseases that were mailed out in the AWSA questionnaire. Aside
from the 8 Behavioral Problems listed, we also had 15 other categories
with a total of 142 various diseases listed. To date we have received
reports back with only 46 (out of the 154 possible) diseases potentially
effecting our breed. This is GOOD news, since ALL breeds
have defective genes. We are not concerned with proving that our dogs are
genetically perfect, but with learning just what defects we DO carry and
how often they appear! With this information, we can track back the
sources and avoid breeding CARRIERS of the SAME defects, thus reducing the
incidence of these problems within the entire breed! Yes, it is THAT
simple!
(Please click on the
chart to view at full size.)
As of January 2001, we have collected data on 351 dogs. The above chart
reflects 31% of the actual 1162 that qualify (fall within the age ranges
of the above groups).
On the next page we are reprinting one of Dr. Padgetts
charts from his AWSA seminar. True REBs (Reputable Experienced
Breeders) have always done in depth pedigree studies prior to selecting
their breeding stock. They fully understood how the recessives work, and
how to accentuate or eliminate certain desirable/undesirable
characteristics. In most cases these breeders had to rely on genetic data
provided to them by other breeders that were familiar with the littermates
of the dogs in their lines. Attaining as much of this information as
possible was imperative in making the best decisions for each combination.
Using this system (see guide) will also allow us to reduce/eliminate the
defective genes that are now permeating our breed! With adequate data,
carriers can be identified and not bred to other carriers with the SAME
defective genes. Please take some time to study this chart carefully.
TABLE 5.6
|
Relationship |
Degree of
Relationship |
Minimum Carrier
Risk |
|
Parent, Progeny |
1 |
100% |
|
Full Brother / Sister |
1 |
66.6% |
|
Grandparents, Aunts, Uncles,
Half-brothers or sisters, Grandchildren |
2 |
50.0% |
|
Niece, Nephew |
2 |
33.3% |
|
Great-grandparent, First Cousins,
Half-aunts and uncles, Great-grandchildren |
3 |
25.0% |
|
Great-great-grandparents, First
Cousin once removed, Second Cousins |
- |
12.5% |
|
Great-great-great grandparent, First
Cousin twice removed, Third Cousins |
- |
6.25% |
*This chart is used for Autosomal Recessive Traits as
well as Polygenic Traits
the risk for the Polygenic Trait will be "at least" this
percentage.
Any person that doesnt fully understand these basic
principles has no business producing puppies, much less calling themselves
a breeder. It takes decades of dedication to a specific program
before a true REB can expect to see the desired fruits of their labor! To
complicate things even more, when working with heavily inbred lines, other
principles also apply! A breeder must consider the RC percentages they
will be working with, as well as the influence (especially homozygous) of
each dog in the extended pedigree!! Most people that produce puppies only
look at the parents for desirable type
without any honest
consideration of the more important factors, like eliminating/reducing the
incidence of genetic diseases in their stock. They are more concerned
about how pretty or how big their puppies will be, then for
the new owner that may wake up some morning to find his dog dead at the
foot of his bed! SAS is one of the problems that was noted in our breed
way back in the early 90s when an accidental inbreeding happened. We
know the original carriers, and we must continue to work carefully
with that line to prevent this disease from fully polluting the entire
genepool!! Unfortunately due to politics (people producing puppies
for profit) and the many splinter groups that resulted, much needed
(recent) data has been lost. With this survey, we are working very hard to
repair the cracks, and prepare a better future for our beloved dogs!
| We hope that you have already
mailed in your survey, but if not, please do so today! The future
of this entire breed depends on everyone working together for the
benefit of these dogs! |
|